This annotation seemed to be a key concept in the big picture.

 

I thought this was an interesting question if it possible to mushfake through a discourse all the way or is there a limit.

This related to how the prime minister didn’t shake hands because the correct “physical language” instead in the case Gee is talking about normal verbal/written language.

Peer Review Plan

I am going to move this into a later part of the second paragraph. I am then going  to fill the empty space with the next plan of action.

I am going to add to the introduction and focus much more on introducing the topic and specifically Gee and Cuddy so the reader understands the topic better.

I am finally going to take this paragraph and make it into a body paragraph and elaborate and make it into a fully developed body paragraph.

New Thoughts

The new topic of “mushfake” is going to be evaluated and help my paper tremendously because it relates to what Cuddy says very well. Cuddy always talks about faking it until you make it and now Gee is explaining a similar phenomena but calling it “mushfake”. This even furthers my thesis that they are even more similar deep down although the superficial differences they may pose.

 collreadwrit1a